|
August 11, 2001 - The Daily Record Online (MD)
Source: http://www.mddailyrecord.com/archives/2_35_statewide/businessnews/49212-1.html
NEWS
SUMMARY: Maryland lawmakers mostly failures
By
STAFF & WIRE REPORTS
If
as in high school it takes at least a 60 percent to pass, then 23
of Maryland’s 47 state senators and 82 of its 141 delegates failed.
That’s
according to the “test” proctored by Maryland Business for Responsive
Government (MBRG), a pro-business organization headed by Robert
O. C. “Rocky” Worcester. The grades are based on how often lawmakers
voted with MBRG on select bills during the 2001 session (i.e. universal
health care, collective bargaining).
Not
one of the 105 failures — that’s right, 56 percent of the entire
General Assembly failed — was a Republican. And not one of the lawmakers
to score better than 80 percent was a Democrat.
Among
the top scorers: Carroll County’s Del. Carmen Amedori (94 percent),
Western Maryland’s Sen. Alexander X. Mooney (94 percent) and Del.
David R. Brinkley (93 percent), Baltimore County’s Sen.
Andrew P. Harris (93 percent) and Harford County’s Sen. Nancy Jacobs
(92 percent).
Covering
your ... name
With
the introduction later this year of two new Internet domain names,
.biz and .info, trademark owners will have a better means of preventing
cyber-squatters from stealing their domain names, says Maxine Lans
Retsky of Baltimore-based Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe.
“The
companies responsible for registering new domain names for .biz
and .info will offer trademark owners ways to protect their marks
before the domains become available to the general public,” Retsky
said. “Fighting domain name infringement is costly. While the new
protections do not guarantee a third party will not register an
infringing domain name, they should help trademark owners avoid
blatant piracy.”
Pay
your kids
From
the good point file this week ... If adults don’t work for free,
why should kids?
“Paying
young people for good grades not only increases their academic performance
in school, it also prepares them for the real world — where performance
equals rewards,” says Dr. Robert Butterworth, president of the Los
Angeles-based International Trauma Associates.
Butterworth
maintains that poor school performance is rarely a result of a lack
of academic ability, but a failure of parents to become involved
in their youngsters' schooling. He recommends using the methods
that industry uses to motivate its employees -— rewards and positive
involvement.
Americans
are cows
If
we are what we eat, then Americans are, in increasing numbers, cows.
That’s right. Second-quarter 2001 data shows consumer demand for
U.S. beef remains strong.
According
to a peer-reviewed demand index, demand increased 5 percent the
second quarter of 2001 compared to the same quarter the previous
year.
“After
a 20-year downturn, the beef industry has shown an increase in 10
of the last 12 quarters,” said Dan Hammond, chairman of the Cattlemen's
Beef Board.
Give
us choice
When
it comes to employer-sponsored health benefits, more than half of
10,000 workers surveyed want more choices and are even willing to
pay more to receive them, according to Watson Wyatt, a Washington-based
consulting firm.
Fifty-four
percent of employees also prefer paying larger co-payments at the
time a service is received, while 25 percent prefer paying higher
premiums.
“Allowing
employees to choose from a variety of health plans is associated
with employee satisfaction, and consumers are now demanding a choice
of physicians and treatments,” says Steve Richter, a senior health-care
consultant with Watson.
Workers
need free stuff
To
increase worker productivity, provide free breakfast, lunch, soft-serve
ice cream, popcorn and other goodies, recommends Brian Stowell,
president of a New Hampshire cabinetry company, who says the technique
is reaping great rewards for him.
The
goodies, you see, are delivered once certain goals are met.
“It
wasn't fun anymore. Now our teams manage themselves, work together,
communicate like never before and are extremely focused on the overall
goals of our company and on the bottom line,” Stowell said.
We
don’t doubt or dismiss Stowell’s approach. But it did get us to
wondering: Didn’t employees formerly do their work in exchange for
pay?
|