|
March 8, 2001 - The Gazette (MD)
Judiciary
Committee to hear animal cruelty bill
by Sherry Greenfield
Staff Writer
Mar. 8, 2001
Lawmakers in Annapolis
want to stop the mutilation, torture, killing and beating of animals.
To that end, the House of Delegates Judiciary Committee will hear
a bill March 16 that would increase penalties against offenders.
"We do have people
performing heinous acts on animals," said Del. David Brinkley (R-Dist.
4A) of New Market, who is one of 77 delegates sponsoring House Bill
649. Its companion, Senate Bill 356, is being debated in the Senate
Judicial Proceeding Committee.
Both bills stem from
a Feb. 4 incident in Salisbury, where three teens allegedly set
fire to a 6-month-old pit bull terrier. The fire spread to two homes
and killed the dog.
Both bills also would
help in the fight against domestic violence, since experts contend
there is a link between cruelty to animals and violence to women.
Currently, people who
are convicted of cruelty to animals are charged with a misdemeanor
and given 90 days in jail for torturing and beating an animal or
three years in jail for killing it. House Bill 649 would elevate
the charge to a felony with a sentence of three years in jail.
Hunting and slaughtering
animals for food are excluded.
The bill also would
allow the court to order psychological counseling for people convicted
of the charge.
Del. Joseph Bartlett
(R-Dist. 3) of Middletown, a sponsor of the bill, supports this
component.
"If we can stop these
people and get them help, then we've done our job," he said.
Bartlett is also one
of many who pointed out the connection between cruelty to animals
and violence against women and others.
"When you look at the
evidence and look at the statistics, people committing violent acts
on animals usually progress to humans," Bartlett said.
Warren Spaid, executive
director of Heartly House in Frederick, agrees. "We see a correlation
between animal cruelty and domestic violence," he said. "We also
hear frequently of people that don't want to leave a relationship
because a family pet is involved. We've recognized this for years."
The Frederick County
State's Attorney's Office investigates and prosecutes between 15
to 20 cases of cruelty to animals a year. Many of them directly
relate to domestic violence.
"We see a lot of these
cases in the context of domestic violence," Assistant State's Attorney
Mary Drawbaugh said. "A lot of women are upset with their males
because of their inappropriate behavior toward their animals."
The Humane Society of
the United States also draws a correlation.
"The connection between
animal cruelty and violence against people is well documented,"
said Nancy Perry, HSUS director of government affairs. "Not only
will SB 356 protect animals, it will also protect Marylanders from
becoming victims of domestic violence, child abuse and other forms
of violence."
State Sen. Philip Jimeno
(D-Dist. 31) of Anne Arundel County introduced the Senate bill because
of that connection. "I'm convinced that there is an actual link
that leads to violence against spouses and children," he said.
Thirty-one states, including
Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware and the District of Columbia, have
laws making animal cruelty a felony. Animal rights activist Theresa
Rutter thinks the time is now for Maryland to enact the same law.
"I have always believed
in animal rights," Rutter said. "Several years ago I began lobbying
for animal rights, and I've been involved in the effort ever since."
Rutter would like to
see the language in both bills stronger, but she stands in support.
"It's a good bill,"
she said. "It's not as strong as it could be. I think any cruelty
toward animals should be a felony, but I will be immensely satisfied
if it passes. In a perfect world, we wouldn't need this legislation.
Return
to List of Articles
|